Petitioner filed a public interest writ petition seeking quashing of certain instructions. Counsel submitted withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a representation, which was accepted.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-18640-2016
Date of decision: 03.11.2016
J.S. Ghotra
..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. Anilendra Pandey and Mr. CS Bagri, Advocates for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
( AJAY KUMAR MITTAL ) JUDGE
November 03, 2016 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
Rishu Kataria 2016.11.07 10:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J.S. Ghotra
State of Haryana
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
