Petitioners withdrew the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after the learned counsel was permitted to withdraw the same.
Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with relevant and adequate information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17471 of 2016. Date of Decision: August 27, 2016
Surender Kumar and another ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.
*******
Present: Mr.Mukesh Rao, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J . (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks and is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, with relevant and adequate information.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
August 27, 2016 [SUDIP AHLUWALIA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No
Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.08.30 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Surender Kumar and another
State of Haryana and another
Surya Kant
Sudip Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
