Disposed

Harmeet Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Aug 2016CWP/17320/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought compensation for land used for a Bandh on the Ghaggar river bank. The Court disposed of the writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits, directing respondents to reconsider the petitioner's claim based on similar precedents.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's claim on merits within four months and pass appropriate order.

Harmeet Singh Vs State of Haryana & Anr. — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.17320 of 2016. Date of Decision: August 26, 2016

¶3

Harmeet Singh ......Petitioner versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA.

¶5

*******

¶6

Present: Mr.J.S.Thind, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶7

-.-

¶8

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶9

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶10

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶11

¶12

Surya Kant, J . (Oral)

¶13

The petitioner seeks a direction to the State of Haryana and Collector, Sirsa to pay compensation for his land said to have been utilized for construction of Bandh/dam on the banks of Ghaggar river.

¶14

The land of the petitioner is situated within the revenue estate of village Ala Noor, Tehsil and District Sirsa. The judgments placed on record passed by the Civil Court in respect of identical claim was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

¶15

In this view of the matter, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner as contained in his representations dated 27.02.2016 and 02.08.2016 (P-8 & P-9, respectively) and decide the

¶16

same keeping in view the principles laid down in the earlier decisions Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.08.30 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this documentincluding the Civil Court judgment dated 30.08.2013 passed in the case of Chandigarh

¶17

[2]

¶18

CWP No.17320 of 2016

¶19

similarly placed land-owners. An appropriate order in this regard be passed within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of

this order.

Ordered accordingly.

Dasti.

[SURYA KANT] JUDGE

¶24

August 26, 2016 [SUDIP AHLUWALIA] mohinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

¶25

Mohinder Kumar Kamboj 2016.08.30 16:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Harmeet Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harmeet Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pehlad Singh@Prahlad Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Kanshi Ram Vs State of Haryana and Others

Panjabi Univerisity Patiala through Registrar Vs Anita Sharma

Har Chand & Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Prakash Chand Saini & Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Patram & Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.