Petitioners challenged lack of service regularization via writ petition. Court directed them to submit individual representations under the relevant policy within 15 days before deciding merits.
Direction to petitioners to approach respondent No. 1 individually for regularization within 15 days so that respondent can decide within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Civil Writ Petition No. 16668 of 2012 (O&M)
-1-
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 16668 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.2.2016.
Joginder Pal and others
........Petitioners
Versus
Bhakra Beas Management Board and others
.......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. S.S.Rana, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Yashdeep Nain, Advocate for Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, Advocate for the respondents.
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents to regularize their services.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that for regularization of services of daily rated/work charge workers, policy Annexure R-3 has been framed. Petitioners have not individually approached the respondents for consideration of their cases for regularization of their services in terms of Annexure R-3. Learned counsel has further submitted that as and when exigency arises, seasonal workers including the petitioners would be called by the respondents as per their seniority.
Accordingly, without adverting to the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioners
GURPREET SINGH 2016.02.29 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
-2-
Civil Writ Petition No. 16668 of 2012 (O&M)
individually approach respondent No.1 by way of representation for consideration of their case for regularization of their services in terms of Annexure R-3 within 15 days from today, then respondent No. 1 shall dispose of the said representation within three months from the date of receipt of the representation, by passing a speaking order.
(SABINA) JUDGE
February 24, 2016 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2016.02.29 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners seeking regularization of services must approach respondents under the stipulated policy without pending individual representations first.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Joginder Pal and others
Bhakra Beas Management Board and others
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
