This judgment dismisses a writ petition for want of prosecution because the petitioners, despite complete service, did not appear on their behalf after the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KAPIL 2016.02.25 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
CWP-14138-1995 Date of Decision:24.02.2016
Bhagwan Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Neeraj Yadav, AAG, Punjab.
SABINA, J.
Service of the petitioners is complete but none has
appeared on their behalf.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
February 24, 2016 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE
Bhagwan Singh and others
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Punjab, Chandigarh and others
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
