Yogesh Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15969 of 2014 Date of decision: 01.12.2016
Yogesh Kumar
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Manoj Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Indresh Goel, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. S.K. Yadav, Advocate, for respondent no. 3.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel submits that the information as sought for has been provided and in such circumstances, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
01.12.2016 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Shivani Gupta 2016.12.03 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Yogesh Kumar
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court