Order referencing a linked judgment for the decision on the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15923 of 2015 Date of decision: 04.10.2016
M/s. Nabh Kamal Bus Service (Regd.) ....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Chandumajra, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
For order, see judgment of even date passed in CWP No. 9036
of 2015, Daya Kishan vs. The State Transport Commissioner, Punjab and
others .
04.10.2016 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Shivani Gupta 2016.10.06 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s. Nabh Kamal Bus Service (Regd.)
State Transport Commissioner, Punjab
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
