Disposed

Dharam Pal Garg v. State of Punjab etc.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Oct 2016CWP/15230/1995

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning pension benefits, the Court directed the medical college to pay petitioner's calculated benefits plus 9% interest within two months. The State of Punjab was directed to consider the petitioner's claim for Armed Constable Pay from the regularization date and grant it within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No.3 to pay benefits and interest; directed State to decide ACP claim within three months.

Dharam Pal Garg Vs State of Punjab… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP No.15230 of 1995 Date of decision: 04.10.2016

Dharam Pal Garg

..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶7

..Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

¶9

Present: Mr. Ramesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 and 2-State.

¶11

Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate for respondent No.3.

¶12

¶13

Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)

¶14

Dr. Gurmeet Kaur, Principal, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College, Faridkot-respondent No.3, who is present in person, has submitted her affidavit mentioning therein total calculations along with amount of delay in the Court in pursuance of order passed by this Court on 10.03.2016 and the same is taken on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is also entitled for interest because of the delay as has been claimed in the present writ petition.

¶16

On perusal of affidavit of respondent No.3, it is apparent that delay is there and the petitioner is entitled for interest as well.

¶17

Accordingly, respondent No.3 is directed to give benefits to the

¶18

Neetu Rani 2016.10.07 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CWP No.15230 of 1995

¶20

¶21

petitioner as mentioned in the affidavit along with interest @ 9% per annum within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Respondent-State is also directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of ACP from the date of his regularization within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and in case, the petitioner is found to be entitled for the relief claimed, the same be granted to him within a period of two months thereafter.

¶23

In case, the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.

¶24

Disposed of accordingly.

¶25

04.10.2016		(DAYA CHAUDHARY)
neetu		JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable	√ Yes/No √ Yes/No

¶26

Neetu Rani 2016.10.07 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Dharam Pal Garg v. State of Punjab etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharam Pal Garg v. State of Punjab etc.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satya Bhalla Vs Secy. Edu. & Fin U.T. Admn. Chd.

Darshan Singh Saini & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Manpinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Kuldeep Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Managing Committee Arya High School Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

M/S Nabh Kamal Bus Service Regd Vs State Transport Commissioner Pb and Ors.