Disposed

Pankaj Gupta v. Registrar Co-Op Societies Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Jul 2016CWP/13710/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana issued directions in a writ petition to the manager of a cooperative society to consider the petitioner's representation regarding a grievance and decide the matter within three months, without expressing an opinion on the merits or limitation.

What did the court decide?

Directive to the manager to decide the petitioner's representation within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Pankaj Gupta Vs Registrar Co-Op Societies… — Cooperative Societies | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No. 13710 of 2016 Date of Decision: 22.7.2016

Pankaj Gupta

.....Petitioner

Vs.

Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Haryana and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

¶9

Present : Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)

¶12

Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, he finally approached respondent No.4 by way of self contained representation dated 1.3.2016 (Annexure P-11), but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case the Manager, Sarswati Kunj Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Wazirabad, Gurargaon-respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide his representation, within a reasonable time.

¶14

AMIT KUMAR 2016.07.22 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶15

Civil Writ Petition No. 13710 of 2016 2

¶16

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, if any, lest it should prejudice the rights of either of the parties, the Manager, Sarswati Kunj Cooperative House Building Society Limited, Wazirabad, Gurargaon-respondent No.4 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide his representation dated 1.3.2016 (Annexure P-11) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶17

With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present petition stands disposed of.

¶18

(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE

¶19

22.7.2016. Ak Sharma

¶20

AMIT KUMAR 2016.07.22 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Pankaj Gupta v. Registrar Co-Op Societies Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Gupta v. Registrar Co-Op Societies Haryana and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rajbala Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dharminder Singh Vs Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab and Ors.

Jagmohan Singh @ Sonu Vs State of Punjab

Pardeep Kumar Vs the F.C.-Cum- Secy and Ors.

Lal Singh etc. Vs Ld Financial Commissioner Punjab etc.