The writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner with the Court's permission. The Court allowed the withdrawal subject to liberty to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action with better particulars, specifically laying challenge to the policy involved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 109 of 2010 Date of Decision: 21.7.2016
Rajbala
.....Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India and others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Present : Mr. Shubham Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Vinod S. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.S. Baidwan, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 4.
Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No. 2 and 3.
RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J. (ORAL)
After arguing the case for some time and realising that the policy is not under challenge, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action but with better particulars, including laying challenge to the policy.
Permission is granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE
21.7.2016 Ak Sharma
AMIT KUMAR 2016.07.22 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Rajbala
Union of India
Rameshwarsingh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
