Petitioner's Writ Petition concerning inter se seniority dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner did not pursue the case post-hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13193 of 1997 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.10.2016
Daya Krishan
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rupam Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab for the respondents -State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
The case is of the year 1997 and the dispute is of interse seniority between the petitioner and the respondents.
On the last date of hearing, counsel for the petitioner took time
to place on record copy of the letter, which is relevant to decide the issue involved in the present case.
Neither counsel for the petitioner is present nor the order passed on the last date of hearing has been complied with.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
case.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
20.10.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
Neetu Rani 2016.10.21 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Daya Krishan
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
