Allowed

Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Oct 2016CRM-M/5772/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC, the High Court made an ad-interim bail order absolute. The petitioner was directed to deposit ₹5 lacs in an FDR in the child’s name with the trial court within two months.

What did the court decide?

Ad interim anticipatory bail granted earlier was made absolute on condition of deposit of `5 lacs in FDR in the name of the child before the trial court within two months.

Amit Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

CRM-M-5772-2016

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-5772-2016 Date of Decision:- 20.10.2016

Amit Kumar

....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

¶9

....Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶11

Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶12

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

¶13

Mr. Sarfraz Hussain, Advocate for the complainant.

¶14

¶15

RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)

¶16

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.865 dated 06.11.2015, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Gurgaon, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 506 and 354-A IPC.

¶17

Vide order dated 01.06.2016, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre to enable the petitioner to settle the disputes with the complainant and the parties were directed to appear before the mediation centre of this Court on 12.07.2016. As per the report of the mediator, the

¶18

Naresh Kumar 2016.10.24 16:32 I attest to the accuracy andparties have not been able to resolve their disputes. integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

CRM-M-5772-2016

¶20

-2-

¶21

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 17.02.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposit a sum of `5 lacs in the shape of FDR in the name of child, before the trial Court, within a period of two months, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

¶23

October 20, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶24

Naresh Kumar 2016.10.24 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surennder @ Sonu Vs State of Haryana

Charanjit Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Charanjit Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Tejinder Bahadur Singh Vs Punjab State etc.

Daya Krishan Vs State of Pb.Etc.

Piara Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.