A writ petition challenging the termination of a contract and blacklisting of a firm without a hearing was disposed of as infructuous on a limitation offere conveying a future date for blacklisting not yet in operation.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219
Civil Writ Petition No.12768 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 18, 2016
M/s Ruldu Oil Carriers
....Petitioner
versus
The Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Mr. Vikas Behl, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Arora, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Sonia Kinra 2016.10.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
CWP No.12768 of 2016 (O&M)
-2-
blacklisted for a period of five years w.e.f. 13.06.2016 till 12.06.2021. The same is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. It has been submitted by learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 that in view thereof, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(RAMENDRA JAIN)
October 18, 2016
JUDGE
sonia gugnani
Whether speaking/reasoned?
Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No
Sonia Kinra 2016.10.21 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Ruldu Oil Carriers
The Union of India
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
RAMENDRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
