Disposed

Gobinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Jul 2016CWP/12239/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition alleging inaction by respondent authorities on a representation seeking redress of a grievance. The court directed the Deputy Commissioner to consider the representation and pass an order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Deputy Commissioner to consider the representation dated 11.3.2016 and pass an appropriate order within three months.

Gobinder Pal Singh Vs State of… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

CWP No.12239 of 2016

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

CWP No.12239 of 2016 Date of Decision : 4.7.2016

¶5

Gobinderpal Singh Gill

¶6

......Petitioner

¶7

Vs. State of Punjab and others

¶8

......Respondents

¶9

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

¶10

Present : Mr. B.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

¶12

Whether the judgement should be reported in Digest ?

¶13

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK, J

¶14

Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this court by way of instant writ petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the genuine grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed, he approached the respondent authorities by way of representation dated 11.3.2016 (Annexure P-6), but the same is also pending decision. He further submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case respondent no.3 is directed to look into the matter and pass appropriate order on the representation dated 11.3.2016 (Annexure P-6).

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and without

¶17

GREESH SAHNI 2016.07.05 13:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

¶19

CWP No.12239 of 2016

¶20

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, Deputy Commissioner, Ludhiana-respondent no.3 is directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner raised vide his representation dated 11.3.2016 (Annexure P-6) and pass an appropriate order thereon, strictly in accordance with law and at an early date, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶21

With the abovesaid observations made and directions issued, present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

4.7.2016 (RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) GS JUDGE

¶23

GREESH SAHNI 2016.07.05 13:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Gobinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gobinder Pal Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gian Singh Vs U.T., Chandigarh

State Ofharyana Vs Krishan Lal and Ors.

Renu Chetal and Others Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

M/S J S T Engineers and Contractors Vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. and Others

Girdhari Lal and Ors. Vs Superintending Canal Officer Ferozepur & Ors.

Naresh and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.