The petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous petition to file a fresh one. The Court dismissed the withdrawal petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a new petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-44205 of 2015 Date of Decision: January 05, 2016
Rajesh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Rajiv Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition with better
particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
January 05, 2016 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2016.01.05 16:21 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document
Rajesh Kumar
State of Haryana & Ors.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
