The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's prayer to avail alternative remedies, with the State having no objection.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed to enable the petitioner to take recourse to alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-29216 of 2015 Date of Decision: January 05, 2016
Saraj Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.G.S.Sandhu, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr.P.S.Ghuman, Addl.AG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel prays for withdrawal of the present
petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse to the
alternative remedies available to him under law.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the
above-said prayer.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
January 05, 2016 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2016.01.05 16:21 I attest the accuracy and authencity of the document
Saraj Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
