The petitioner, seeking an alternative remedy, withdrew the writ petition. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38778-2016 Date of Decision:- 03.11.2016
Muni Ram
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Rajender Singh Duggal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to avail his alternative
remedy in accordance with law, if so advice.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty.
November 03, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | /No |
Naresh Kumar 2016.11.04 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Muni Ram
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
