Sukhwinder Singh @ Bittu & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
CRM-M-37087-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-37087-2015 Date of Decision: January 6, 2016
Sukhwinder Singh @ Bittu and others
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr.Munish Bhardwaj, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr.R.S.Randhawa, Addl.A.G.Punjab.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Raj Kumar, Police Station, Sohana, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) submits that in view of the compromise, so effected and the statements suffered by the aggrieved person, the Investigating Agency is proposing to submit the final/ untraced report after obtaining the necessary sanction from the competent authority.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the
MEENU 2016.01.07 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
- 2 -
CRM-M-37087-2015
petitioners does not press this petition at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
January 6, 2016 meenu
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
MEENU 2016.01.07 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
Sukhwinder Singh @ Bittu and others
State of Punjab and others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court