Partly allowed

Sushil Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Nov 2016CRM-M/34280/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana made absolute an ad-interim anticipatory bail order previously granted. The court mandated the deposit of Rs 70,000 as a Fixed Deposit Receipt for the minor child of the complainant and directed the petitioners to cooperate with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Absolute anticipatory bail granted; deposit of Rs 70,000 in FDR for minor child of complainant within two weeks; direction to join investigation.

Sushil Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Punjab & Haryana HC (2016)

¶1

CRM-M-34280-2015 & -1CRM-M-33631-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

(1)	CRM No.M	-34280-2015
Sushil Kumar and others		..Petitioners
	Versus
State of Punjab and others		..Respondents
(2)	CRM No.M	-33631-2015
Laxmi Devi		..Petitioner
	Versus
State of Punjab and another		..Respondents
		Date of Decision:- 22.11.2016

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

¶5

Present: Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Anmol Grewal, DAG, Punjab. Mr. S.S. Virk, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ****

¶6

RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)

¶7

As identical points to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, are involved, therefore, I propose to dispose of above-said petitions, arising out of the same case/FIR, by means of this common order, to avoid the repetition of facts.

¶8

Petitioners have preferred the instant separate petitions for the grant of anticipatory bail in a case arising out of FIR No.236 dated Naresh Kumar 2016.12.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document01.09.2015, registered at Police Station City Sangrur, for the commission Chandigarh

¶9

CRM-M-34280-2015 & -2CRM-M-33631-2015

¶10

of offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 323 IPC.

¶11

Vide orders dated 07.10.2015 of this Court, the anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners to enable them to join the investigation and thereafter, the matter was referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court, vide order dated 08.08.2016 to enable the parties to settle the disputes. On 16.11.2016, the case was sent back to this Court for further adjudication as the conciliation efforts between the parties have not been materialized.

¶12

Learned State counsel on instructions from investigating officer has informed that the recovery of 7 tolas of gold is still to be effected from the petitioners.

¶13

In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 07.10.2015, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioners deposit a sum of ` 70,000/- in the shape of FDR in the name of the minor child of the complainant, namely, Garvi, before the trial Court, within a period of two weeks, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Moreover, the petitioners shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶14

Accordingly, the present petitions stand disposed of.

¶15

Novem	ber 22, 2016		(RITU BAHRI )
naresh.k			JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes
	Whether reportable	No

¶16

Naresh Kumar 2016.12.05 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

Sushil Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Kumar & Ors. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarabjit Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Surinder Kumar Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Tarlok Singh Vs Jagwinder Singh and Ors.

Didar Singh etc. Vs State of Punjab etc.

Deepika Vs State of Punjab and Ors.