Dismissed
Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCWP/18174/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18174 of 2016 Date of decision: 21.11.2016
Surinder Kumar
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Roy, Advocate for Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Punjab. for the respondents -State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that vide order dated 18.11.2016, the transfer orders of the petitioner have been cancelled and the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
21.11.2016 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE √ Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No √ Whether Reportable Yes/No
Neetu Rani 2016.11.26 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Surinder Kumar
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court