Single bench order allowing a criminal miscellaneous petition by a default order. The court noted non-service of notices and absence of private respondents, concluding they were not interested, and confirmed the order dated 31.8.2016.
The petition was allowed confirming the order dated 31.8.2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 30603 of 2016 Date of decision: 7.12.20216
Simran Khosla and anr
Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab and ors
Respondent
Present: None for petitioner. Ms.HK Athwal, dAG, Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Notices issued to the private respondents have not been received back served or otherwise. No one has also not put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners, implying thereby that they are not interested in the present petition.
The petition is allowed confirming order dated 31.8.2016.
December 7 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Yes/ No Whether Reportable Yes/ No
Tapinder Singh Mann 2016.12.07 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the private petitioners should be non-interested in the present petition.
Whether the impugned order should be confirmed.
Simran Khosla and anr
State of Punjab and ors
M.M.S. Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
