Vikramjeet Singh Panthey v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-13198 of 2016
Date of decision : 22.04.2016
Vikramjeet Singh Panthey
....Petitioner
V/s
The State of Punjab & anr.
....Respondents
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate for the petitioner.
RAJAN GUPTA J.
Only grievance of the petitioner is that he has made number of representations (Annexures P7 to P12). However, same have not been examined by the concerned authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there has been a forgery in the public records. Permission order of Gurdev Singh has been passed in the back date. Thus, necessary direction needs to be issued by this court.
Heard.
I do not find any ground to interfere in inherent jurisdiction of this court. Petitioner appears to have grievance against Gurdev Singh who is not a party to this petition. Averments made in the petition are totally vague. There is no head or tail. This court finds no ground to interfere. Dismissed.
April 22, 2016 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
AJAY KUMAR 2016.04.22 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Vikramjeet Singh Panthey
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court