High Court granted pre-arrest bail to petitioners Angrej Singh and another, confirming an interim order and requiring continued appearance in proceedings pending since 2013.
Petition allowed; interim order confirmed; pre-arrest bail granted subject to appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TAPINDER SINGH MANN IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB 2016.03.28 18:09 AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr. Misc. M 1244 of 2016 Date of decision:- 28.3.2016
Angrej Singh @ Soni and anr
Petitioners
vs.
State of Punjab
Respondent
Present: Mr. V.K.Gupta, Advocate. Ms. HK Athwal, DAG, Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Pursuant to the interim order passed by this court, the petitioners have already put in appearance before the trial court.
Without expression of any opinion regarding sufficiency of cause for non appearance before the trial court on 24.9.2015, the petitioners can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail in the interest of justice and expeditious disposal of the trial, which is pending since 2013.
The petition is allowed and interim order dated 29.1.2016 is hereby confirmed and the petitioners will remain on bail against the bail bonds already furnished subject to the condition that the petitioners will continue to appear before the trial court and will not absent themselves without any sufficient cause
March 28 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pre-arrest bail should be granted to petitioners who appeared pursuant to an interim order.
Angrej Singh @ Soni and anr
State of Punjab
M.M.S.BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
