Single-judge oral order granting absolute anticipatory bail to petitioner in an IPC 406 and 498-A case, subject to deposit of Rs. 3 lacs as FDR in the name of a child and joining investigation as required.
Ad-interim anticipatory bail made absolute subject to conditions: deposit of Rs. 3 lacs as FDR in child's name; join investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-M-10093-2016
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-10093-2016 Date of Decision:- 18.10.2016
Tarun Bagga
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. F.S. Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Manpreet Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate for respondent No.2.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No.21 dated 26.02.2016, registered at Police Station Women, District Ludhiana, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC.
Learned State counsel has informed that the locker at Bathinda had been operated from which the recovery of gold of six tolas has been made whereas the locker at Ludhiana found to be empty.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it transpires that there was a dispute with regard to the ornaments which had been given Naresh Kumar 2016.10.20 11:52 I attest to the accuracy andby the complainants as gifts to the family members of the petitioner. integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRM-M-10093-2016
-2-
In view of the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, order dated 21.03.2016, passed by this Court whereby the ad-interim anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioner deposit a sum of `3 lacs in the shape of FDR in the name of child, namely, Sartaaj Singh, before the trial Court, within a period of one month, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions as envisaged under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.
Needless to mention, the complainant would be at liberty to approach the police, in case, she apprehend any threat from the accused.
October 18, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | No |
Naresh Kumar 2016.10.20 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for making ad-interim anticipatory bail absolute should be allowed.
What conditions, if any, should be imposed on the grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether the petitioner must deposit a sum of money in a fixed deposit receipt in the name of the child.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tarun Bagga
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
