Petitioner's bail petition dismissed as the petitioner withdrew it. No legal proposition established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-31884 of 2016 Date of decision : 17.10.2016
Rati Ram
....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Mahima Yashpal, A.A.G, Haryana
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, in a case arising out of FIR No. 79 dated 02.10.2015, registered at Women Police Station Sonepat, District Sonepat, who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Sections 354, 376(2) (n), 452 IPC and Section 3 of S.C and S.T Act.
Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Puran stated that the trial is at the fag end, as after recording the evidence of 13 prosecution witnesses, 4 witnesses of the defence has also been recorded.
Faced with the situation, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
17.10.2016 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | No |
GAURAV ARORA 2016.10.19 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rati Ram
State of Haryana
Ritu Bahri
Gaurav Arora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
