Revision petition dismissed as infructuous since the underlying Section 13 petition under Hindu Marriage Act had already been decided, leaving no cause of action.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.4577 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision:12.08.2016
Sucheta Kalia and another
... Petitioners
Vs.
Somendra Kalia
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Ms. Manjari Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners.
None for the respondent.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause of action survives in the present revision petition as petition filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, has been decided.
In view of the aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the revision petition is ordered to be dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 12, 2016 savita Wheather speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2016.08.16 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sucheta Kalia and another
Somendra Kalia
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
