Revision petition dismissed as rendered infructuous because the underlying suit was already decided.
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.2768 of 2016 Date of decision:12.08.2016
Joginder Singh
... Petitioner
Vs.
Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present:Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)
Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents and filed his 'Vakalatnama' in the Court which is taken on record.
Mr. Bhag Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous as the suit has been decided.
The aforementioned fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
In view of the aforementioned statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present revision petition is ordered to be dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE August 12, 2016 savita Wheather speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Savita 2016.08.16 10:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Joginder Singh
Smt. Balwinder Kaur and others
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
