The single-paragraph oral order disposed of a petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, as respondents were considering his case. No issues or legal propositions were discussed.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
COCP-1085-2016 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1085-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 22, 2016
Gurbakash Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Keshni Anand Arora and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN.
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. P.P. Chahar, DAG, Haryana, for the respondents.
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage because the respondents are considering his
case.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN)
JUDGE
September 22, 2016 Pkapoor Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable: YES / NO
Prashant Kapoor 2016.09.23 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Gurbakash Singh
Smt. Keshni Anand Arora and another
Rakesh Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
