No advocate appeared for the appellants. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the second appeal due to the appellants' default of appearance and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.3186 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision.14.09.2015
Laxman Saroop and another
.......Appellants
Versus
Padam Saroop Goyal and another
......Respondents
Present: None for the appellants.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
when the matter is called.
and non-prosecution.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
September 14, 2015 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.09.15 14:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Laxman Saroop and another
Padam Saroop Goyal and another
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
