Omparkash v. Chancellor, Hindi Sahitya Sammelan & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This oral judgment condones a 13-day delay in filing the appeal against an order dismissing a second appeal. The second appeal is dismissed without adjudication. The case lacks substantive legal precedent value.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.4126 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision.11.09.2015
Om Parkash
.......Appellant
Versus
Chancellor, Hindi Sahitya Sammelan and others
......Respondents
Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
- Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay in filing appeal was permissible.
Whether the appeal against the dismissal of the second appeal should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Om Parkash
- respondent
Chancellor, Hindi Sahitya Sammelan and others
Coram
K. Kannan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/4126/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court