Partly allowed

Sonia and Ors. v. Bikram Singh and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Feb 2015FAO/4041/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an appeal against lower compensation in a motor accident claim. The court modified the award by adjusting the deduction for mortality, correcting the multiplier, and adding sums for loss of consortium and funeral expenses.

What did the court decide?

Modification of the impugned award to Rs. 10,83,200 by adjusting deduction of earnings, multiplier, and adding compensation for loss of consortium and funeral expenses.

Sonia and Ors. Vs Bikram Singh and Ors. — Motor Accident Claims | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

�� 

¶2

��

¶3

Date of decision: 19^th February, 2015

Sonia and others

� Appellants

Versus

Bikram Chand and others

¶8

� Respondents

¶9

��

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

Present: Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate

¶14

for the appellants.

¶15

Service of respondents No.1 and 2 – dispensed with. Mr. R.K. Bashamboo, Advocate – Standing Counsel for respondent No.3.

¶16

�� 

¶17

Not satisfied over the Award dated 07.03.2003 passed by

¶18

the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panchkula, claimant/appellants have knocked at the doors of this Court in this appeal.

¶19

The sole ground raised by Mr.Neeraj Khanna, Advocate representing the claimant/appellants is over the meagerness of compensation as even the factum of accident to be an outcome of rash and negligent driving of the offending truck is not at all disputed.

¶20

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.11 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

¶21

¶22

��

¶23

From the arguments of the two sides it is by no means disputed and rather is well established on the records (though the original records stood destroyed in the fire) that the deceased Ashwani Kumar was a Constable in Haryana Police and his proven salary as per the salary certificate Ex.PB is shown to be �6,462 per month. The claimants are the widow, two minor children and the widowed mother and the inter=se relationship has never been put to question and so the age of the deceased which is proven to be around 34 years. Learned Tribunal in the light of the submissions as is evident has deducted 1/3 of these earnings for the own upkeep and maintenance of the deceased which is certainly on the higher side keeping in view number of the family members who are dependants which ought to be 1/4 as per the ratio laid down in !�"#��$%&'��(()'$+"��,-'$.� �/%��0��-'1&�'$%��/2"(�� reported in ��3�4��3�&0&14�5�5 .

¶24

It has been rightly contended on behalf of the respondent= insurer by Mr.R.K. Bashamboo that the learned Tribunal has wrongly applied the multiplier of 17 and Mr.Neeraj Khanna squarely accepts that it ought to be 16 in view of **!�'1'�6",'�7��/2"(�0��"12&� �'$(-�/��-�'/&�$�7�'$�/2"��** reported in ��8394�� . Thus, considering all these aspects the deceased in all eventuality must be contributing �4,600 per month to the running of the household and therefore, annual dependency comes to �55,200. Applying the multiplier of 16, the compensation comes to �8,83,200. It has been contended on behalf of the appellants which could not be controverted by the respondent’s counsel that not much has been awarded under

¶25

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.11 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

¶26

¶27

��

¶28

the conventional heads for which a sum of �10,000 has been given by way of funeral expenses, and which argument of the appellants’ counsel certainly needs to be accepted having regard to the fact that widow has lost her husband and is entitled to compensation on account of loss of consortium, the family has lost its sole bread earner, a source of love, affection as well as protection and ought to be compensated for the same, besides for the expenses incurred on the last rites and ceremonies and under all these conventional heads by some amount of guess work and hypothetical calculations the claimants are awarded a sum of �2.00 lacs. Therefore, total compensation comes to �10,83,200 (rupees ten lacs eighty three thousand two hundred).

¶29

Besides this, the claimants are also entitled to interest @7.5% p.a. on the enhanced amount from the date of filing of the appeal till realization. Interim compensation paid, if any, shall be adjusted. Rest of the stipulations laid down by the Tribunal need not be disturbed. However, if any of the minor claimants has attained majority, his/her share shall not be resorted to by way of FDR.

¶30

With this, the impugned Award is modified by way of acceptance of the instant appeal in those terms.

¶31

3��4� ��

¶32

�":)'.��8 ��;� ��

¶33

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.03.11 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court

Sonia and Ors. v. Bikram Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonia and Ors. v. Bikram Singh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Devinder Kumar Singla Vs Shalinder Bhalla

Palwinder Singh & Ors. Vs M.S. Sandhu & Ors.

Renu & Ors. Vs Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Naresh Kumar Sehgal Vs Mohd. Tayyab and Ors.

Raj Kumar & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Hindu Kanya College Vs State of Punjab and Ors.