Persistent corruption mark added to the text. On the petition, counsel stated it may be dismissed as withdrawn. The court ordered the dismissal of the petition. No substantive legal grounds or subject matter were discernible in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
238
������������������������� Date of Decision ��������������
Raj Kumar and others
&Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others
&Respondents
������ ���������������� ������� �!���� �"��� !��
Present: * Mr.S.S.Kainth, Advocate for Mr.R.K.Arya, Advocate for the petitioner.
��� �!���� �"��� !��#����
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petition
may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
$%&'()'*���#����+ ���� �!���� �"��� !���
gian
������������������!"�
GIANENDER KUMAR 2015.02.19 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Kumar and others
Union of India and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
