Dismissed
Shamshad v. Suraj Singh
Punjab & Haryana HCFAO/1735/1996
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
F.A.O. No.1735 of 1996
.....
Date of decision:11.5.2015
Shamshad
.....Appellant
v.
Suraj Singh and another
.....Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
......
Present: Mr. Chandeep Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for the appellant.
None for respondent No.1.
Ms. Nidhi, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate for respondent No.2-RSRTC.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The appeal is dismissed. For reasons, see separate detailed order passed today in F.A.O. No.811 of 1995, Samsad and another v. The
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur and another.
May 11 2015.
(Inderjit Singh)
Judge
hsp
HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2015.05.25 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Samsad and another v. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur and anotherReferred¶16
F.A.O. No.811 of 1995, Samsad and another v. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur and another
Shamshad
Suraj Singh
Another
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court