Single judge dismissed a revision petition challenging a maintenance award. The court found no cause for modification of the awarded amount pending fresh proof of income, allowing the petitioner to seek enhancement subsequently.
Revision petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to seek enhancement with proper proof.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No.2769 of 2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No.2769 of 2015 Date of Decision.08.05.2015
Smt. Vidhata
.......Petitioner
Versus
Gurpreet Singh Bhalla
......Respondent
Present: Mr. G.S. Chahal, Advocate for Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)
which has been granted on the preliminary evidence which is produced before the Court below. The Court below has granted 4,000/- as maintenance for the wife and minor child who is 9 years of age. According to the counsel, the respondent is a property dealer who owns a house and a car. With no specific details of the income status of such a property dealer if the Court has awarded 4,000/-, I will find no cause for modification.
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.05.15 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
C.R. No.2769 of 2015 -2-
intervention at this stage.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE May 08, 2015 Pankaj*
PANKAJ KUMAR 2015.05.15 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow modification of the maintenance award granted by the lower court.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to intervene at this stage.
Smt. Vidhata
Gurpreet Singh Bhalla
K. KANNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
