The Acting Chief Justice allowed an identical writ petition as a companion case previously decided on the same day, given the petitioner is a Government of Punjab Enterprise with an identical role.
Allowance of the writ petition based on a prior disposal of an identical petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8092 of 2015 Date of Decision:- 28.04.2015
M/s. Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd. ......Petitioner(s)
vs.
UOI and others
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate, for the respondent.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Notice of motion.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the
respondent-Union of India.
The writ petition is identical to a group of writ petitions including writ petition No. 6226 of 2015 which we disposed of vide separate order and judgment dated 09.04.2015.
The writ petition is accordingly allowed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
28.04.2015
shivani
SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.04.30 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s. Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd.
UOI
S.J. Vazifdar
G.S. Sandhawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
