The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the writ petition on the same principles as in a group of identical petitions disposed of earlier by a separate order dated 09.04.2015.
The writ petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 8089 of 2015 Date of Decision:- 28.04.2015
M/s. Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd. ......Petitioner(s)
vs.
UOI and others
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocate, for the respondent.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
Notice of motion.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the
respondent-Union of India.
The writ petition is identical to a group of writ petitions including writ petition No. 6226 of 2015 which we disposed of vide separate order and judgment dated 09.04.2015.
The writ petition is accordingly allowed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
28.04.2015
shivani
SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.04.30 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s. Punjab State Grains Procurement Corporation Ltd.
Union of India and others
S.J. VAZIFDAR
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
