Disposed

Suresh Kumar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Jan 2015CWP/312/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners selected for RPF Constable post were declared unfit by Medical Board. Court directed authorities to conduct a Review Medical Board at Delhi within two weeks and take consequential action if declared fit.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent nos.2 to 5 to conduct Review Medical Board at Delhi within two weeks and take further consequential action if declared fit.

Suresh Kumar and Anr. Vs Union of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.312 of 2015 Date of Decision: January 30, 2015

¶3

Suresh Kumar and another .....Petitioners versus

¶4

Union of India and others .....Respondents

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶6

Present:Mr.Mohit Nehra, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate, for respondent Nos.1 to 5.

¶7

-.-

¶8

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶9

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶10

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶11

¶12

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶13

The petitioners were selected for recruitment as Constables in the Railway Protection Force. The Medical Board, however, declared them unfit due to which they could not be appointed. The petitioners firstly approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench and now this Court to direct the official respondents to conduct their Review Medical Board.

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions from Mr.K.N.Srivastava, Chief Office Superintendent, Railway Protection Force, Northern Railways, Ambala Cantt, states that the authorities have no objection in conducting the petitioners Review Medical Board. He further states that the Review Medical Board shall be conducted within two weeks.

¶15

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.06 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

CWP No.312 of 2015 [2]

¶17

We, thus, disposed of this writ petition with a direction to respondent nos.2 to 5 that let the Review Medical Board of the petitioners be held at Delhi within two weeks as per the above-stated undertaking and if they are declared medically fit, let further consequential action be taken without wastage of time.

¶18

Ordered accordingly.

¶19

Dasti.

¶20

January 30, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE

¶21

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.06 15:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Suresh Kumar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tirlok Chand etc. Vs Sarkhan Singh etc.

Om Parkash Yadav Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ram Niwas and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Sanjeev & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Anand College of Education Vs Ncte and Ors.

Devinder Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.