Dismissed

Sanjeev & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC30 Jan 2015CWP/24593/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Sanjeev and others against the State of Haryana with liberty to file a fresh petition, while directing the continuation of an existing status-quo order for two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file a fresh petition; order maintaining status-quo re: possession continued for two weeks.

Sanjeev & Ors. Vs State of Haryana… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.24593 of 2014 Date of Decision: January 30, 2015

Sanjeev and others

.....Petitioners

versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.

¶9

Present:Mr.Paramvir Singh Sikand, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶10

Mr.RKS Brar, Additional AG, Haryana. Mr.Nishan Singh Chahal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Mr.V.B.Aggarwal, Adv.,for respondent Nos.6&7.

¶11

-.-

¶12

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that against the order dated 24.04.2014 (Annexure P-12), revision petition was filed but the same has since been withdrawn.

¶14

If that is so and as prayed for, the instant writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action alongwith complete facts and details. It is, however, directed that the order dated 02.12.2014 to maintain status-quo re: possession shall continue to operate for two weeks.

¶15

Ordered accordingly. Dasti.

¶16

January 30, 2015 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE

¶17

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.04 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶18

CWP No.

¶19

[2]

¶20

104 CM No.1254 of 2015 in CWP No.24593 of 2014

¶21

¶22

Sanjeev and others versus State of Haryana and others

¶23

Present : Mr.Paramvir Singh Sikand, Advocate,

¶24

for the petitioners. Mr.RKS Brar, Additional AG, Haryana. Mr.V.B.Aggarwal, Advocate, for the applicant-respondent Nos.6 & 7. * * *

¶25

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the

¶26

same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and written statement filed on behalf of respondent Nos.6 & 7 is taken on record.

¶27

CM stands disposed of.

¶28

(SURYA KANT)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

January 30, 2015 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH)

¶31

Mohinder JUDGE

¶32

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.02.04 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Sanjeev & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tirlok Chand etc. Vs Sarkhan Singh etc.

Om Parkash Yadav Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ram Niwas and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Suresh Kumar and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Anand College of Education Vs Ncte and Ors.

Devinder Singh Vs State of Haryana and Ors.