Petitioner sought writ relief. Counsel submitted the claim had already been granted. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 23763 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision: February 26, 2015
Anita Cheema 3Petitioner
Versus
State of Pb. & ors.
666Respondents
������ ����������������������������������������
Present: 6 Mrs. Vertika H. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ajaib Singh, Addl.A.G., Punjab
�����������������������
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the relief claimed by the petitioner has already been granted to her and so the present writ petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
26.02.2015 ���������������������� dinesh �����
DINESH KUMAR 2015.03.01 22:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Anita Cheema
State of Pb.
Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
