Disposed

Mohinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC28 Oct 2015CWP/22836/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court directed State to ascertain facts and take remedial steps within four months regarding alleged non-execution of eviction order under Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961, citing natural justice principles without hearing all respondents on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to ascertain true facts and take necessary remedial steps within four months observing principles of natural justice

Mohinder Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors. — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.22836 of 2015 Date of Decision: October 28, 2015

¶3

Mohinder Singh and others

¶4

....Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

State of Punjab and others .....Respondents

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶8

Present: Mr.M.S.Kang, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶9

-.-

¶10

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶11

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶12

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶13

¶14

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶15

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 & 2 only at

¶16

this stage.

¶17

On our asking, Mr.Rajesh Bhardwaj, learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on their behalf.

¶18

Let two copies of the writ petition be supplied to the State counsel during the course of day failing which this order shall be automatically recalled and the writ petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶19

In view of the nature of order which we propose to pass, it is not necessary to seek any counter-reply from respondent Nos.1 & 2 or to serve respondent Nos.3 & 4 at this stage as no order prejudicial to their interest is being passed.

¶20

The petitioners are residents of village Kariha, Tehsil Nawanshahr, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. They allege that an eviction order under Section 7 of the Punjab

¶21

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.18 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶22

[2]

¶23

CWP No.22836 of 2015

¶24

Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 was passed on 23.01.2004 (P-2) against one Buta Singh at the instance of the Gram Panchayat of their village. It was held that the subjectland vests in Gram Panchayat and Buta Singh was in its illegal possession. According to the petitioners, Buta Singh sold his own land adjoining to the illegally encroached Gram Panchayat land to Smt.Manjit Kaur who is the wife of the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat-respondent No.3. It is further alleged that the Sarpanch and his family have also taken over the possession of Gram Panchayat land as well which was earlier occupied by Buta Singh. On this premise, it is alleged that no action is being taken to execute the eviction order passed against Buta Singh way back in the year 2004.

¶25

The petitioners have raised the above-mentioned claim vide representation-cum-complaint dated 27.05.2015.

¶26

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, however without expressing any views on merits of the allegations levelled by the petitioners moreso when we have not heard respondent Nos.3 & 4 at this stage, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to ascertain the true facts and take necessary remedial steps in accordance with law, after observing the principles of natural justice. Let the needful be done within a period of four months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶27

Dasti. [SURYA KANT] JUDGE October 28, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.11.18 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Mohinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundeep Kaur Vs Directorate of Enforcement and Anr.

Sundeep Kaur Vs Directorte of Enforcement and Anr.

Cheddi Ram Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Sanaullah Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Singara Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Municipal Committee Ganaur Vs Commissioner Rohtak Division & Ors.