Allowed

Sundeep Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Oct 2015CRM-M/34070/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted interim bail to the petitioner, a resident of Canada, facing proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court directed her personal surrender, deposit of passports, and adherence to conditions regarding property attachment.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted subject to personal surrender, deposit of passports, non-exit from India, and maintenance of property attachment.

Sundeep Kaur Vs Directorate of Enforcement and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Criminal Misc.-M No.34070 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 16, 2015

Sundeep Kaur

....Petitioner

versus

Directorate of Enforcement, Govt., of India and another

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.

¶9

Present: Mr.Pradeep Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Ranjana Shahi, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶10

-.-

¶11

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

¶16

The petitioner has been summoned in a warrant case through bailable warrants to appear in the Court of learned Special Judge in a statutory complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, 'the 2002 Act')

¶17

In somewhat similar circumstances where during the investigation of complaint, the Enforcement Directorate did not choose to arrest the suspect in exercise of its powers under Section 19 of the 2002 Act and the petitioner is ready and willing to face the trial with an undertaking not to cause any hamper to the ongoing proceedings, we have granted

¶18

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.19 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶19

[2]

¶20

CRM-M 34070 of 2015

¶21

interim direction against sending her to judicial custody vide order dated 01.10.2015 passed in CRM-M No.28452 of 2015 (Gurpreet Kaur @ Gurmeet Kaur versus Niranjan Singh, Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India).

¶22

For the reasons assigned in the cited decision, we allow this petition in part in the following terms:-

¶23

(i) the petitioner is directed to surrender in person (not through her counsel) before the Special Court, Patiala on the date fixed or prior thereto and furnish the bail bonds to the entire satisfaction of that Court, whereupon the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail. Since the petitioner is resident of Canada, she is directed to deposit her Canadian passport as well as the Indian Identity/Passport, if any, with the learned Special Judge;

¶24

(ii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Special Court or this Court;

¶25

(iii) the petitioner shall continue to appear before the Special Court and shall not hamper the ongoing trail;

¶26

(iv) the petitioner shall continue to avail the concession of bail subject to the attachment/ seizure of her immovable properties already identified by the Enforcement Directorate;

¶27

(v) The learned Special Judge shall ensure that in this case also no order to release the attached properties is passed;

¶28

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.19 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶29

CRM-M 34070 of 2015

¶30

¶31

(vi) The petitioner shall also abide by such other conditions as may be imposed by learned Special Judge while accepting her bail bonds.

¶32

[SURYA KANT]

¶33

JUDGE

¶34

October 16, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE

¶35

MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.10.19 14:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Sundeep Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sundeep Kaur v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sher Singh and Ors. Vs Joint Development Commissioner Punjab and Ors.

Lakhpat Rai Aggarwal Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Satinder Dhama Vs State of Punjab

Sundeep Kaur Vs Directorte of Enforcement and Anr.

Cheddi Ram Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Manjit Singh & Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.