The High Court dismissed the withdrawn writ petition allowing the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition if the validity of Rules remains upheld in a pending case.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if validity of Rules is upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18259 of 2015 Date of Decision: August 31, 2015
Sunder Lal and others
.....Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.Rajinder Goyal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
As prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition in case the validity of Rules is upheld by this Court in the pending case.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
August 31, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.01 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sunder Lal and others
State of Haryana and others
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
