The petitioners withdrew the writ petition in court and were granted liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars on the same cause of action.
Liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.18206 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 11, 2015
Pala Ram and another
.....Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.H.S.Grewal, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has received some material documents having direct bearing on the merits of the case.
As prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
September 11, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH]
mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.15 12:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Pala Ram
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
