The court allowed a connected CM application. The main writ petition was dismissed upon consent of the petitioner to withdraw it, with liberty to pursue the matter before administrative authorities.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter before administrative authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.17597 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 10, 2015
Harshbir Singh
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.R.C.Setia, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Raman Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
CM No.11862 of 2015
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the documents (P-7 & P-8) are taken on record.
CM stands disposed of.
CWP No.17597 of 2015.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue
the matter before the administrative authorities.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT] JUDGE
September 10, 2015 [JASPAL SINGH] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.09.11 11:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Harshbir Singh
State of Punjab
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
