The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. The dispute regarding the appointment of a magistrate to restore possession was quashed and rendered inoperative by the cancelling of the impugned order.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 218
Civil Writ Petition No.12065 of 2015
Date of Decision: September 08, 2015
Rajesh Kumar
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
. . .
. . .
PRESENT : - Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Kirti Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
. . .
Surya Kant, J (Oral)
affidavit dated 5.8.2015 explaining that the impugned order
dated 6.4.2015 appointing the Naib Tehsildar, Gharaunda as Duty Magistrate for restoration of the possession of disputed
land has already been cancelled and shall not be executed. In
AVIN KUMAR Para 6 of the affidavit, it is further averred that explanation of 2015.09.24 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
CWP No.12065 of 2015
[2]
BDPO, Gharaunda was obtained. As per the said explanation, “neither the present disputed land belong to the Panchayat nor there was any eviction order passed for the eviction of the petitioner”.
(Jaspal Singh) September 08, 2015 Judge avin
AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.24 12:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
Rajesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Surya Kant
Jaspal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
