Partly allowed

Ajmer Gir and Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Sept 2015CWP/16182/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of two cross writ petitions. It maintained status quo on possession until an appeal in one petition is decided but directed speedy disposal of the appeal. In the other, it set aside the impugned order, holding the Appellate Authority failed to assess proper lease money/security despite disbelieving Gram Panchayat, directing it to decide the application for deposit of security w

What did the court decide?

Status quo maintained until appeal decided; Appellate Authority directed to decide appeal urgently by 30.9.2015. In second writ, impugned order set aside; Authority directed to decide security/deposit

Ajmer Gir and Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

¶2

Sr. No.: 229

¶3

Date of Decision: September 08, 2015 1. Civil Writ Petition No.16182 of 2015

¶4

Ajmer Gir & another ..... PETITIONER(S) VERSUS State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

¶5

Civil Writ Petition No.15745 of 2015

¶6

Gram Panchayat, Chandpur, Tehsil Kharar, Block Majri, District SAS Nagar (Mohali) through its Sarpanch

¶7

..... PETITIONER(S)

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENT(S)

¶10

. . .

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

¶12

. . .

¶13

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶14

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶15

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶16

. . .

¶17

PRESENT : - Mr. H.B.S. Baidwan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶18

Mr. K.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

¶19

Mr. Munish Jolly, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

¶20

. . .

¶21

Surya Kant, J (Oral)

¶22

This order shall dispose of cross writ petitions,

¶23

one filed by petitioners - Ajmer Gir and Pirthi Gir, and the other

¶24

filed by the Gram Panchayat of their village against them.

¶25

AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.17 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

¶26

CWP No.16182 of 2015 [2]

¶27

In the petitioner’s writ petition i.e. CWP No.16182 of 2015, they are aggrieved by a non-speaking order passed by the Appellate Authority while dismissing their stay application. This Court directed the authorities to maintain status-quo re: possession till today. We are informed that the appeal is now listed for hearing on 17.9.2015.

¶28

In CWP No.15745 of 2015, the Gram Panchayat is aggrieved by the order rejecting its application by the Appellate Authority in which the Gram Panchayat wanted the respondents to deposit mesne profits before the Appellate Authority.

¶29

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶30

In view of the fact that the appeal preferred by the

¶31

writ petitioners in CWP No.16182 of 2015 is stated to be listed for hearing on 17.9.2015, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to maintain status-quo re: possession till the above stated appeal is decided. However, it is directed that the Appellate Authority shall make an endeavour to decide the appeal on the date fixed or preferably before 30.9.2015.

¶32

In the writ petition filed by the Gram Panchayat i.e. CWP No.15745 of 2015, the impugned order dated 26.2.2015 has to be set aside as the Appellate Authority, after disbelieving the Gram Panchayat’s version that the subject land

¶33

AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.17 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

¶34

CWP No.16182 of 2015 [3]

¶35

could be leased out @ ` 24,000/- per acre per annum, has failed

¶36

to assess the lease money for which the respondents could be asked to furnish adequate security so that interest of the Gram Panchayat could be protected. The Appellate Authority is thus directed to decide the application for the deposit of security or mesne profits, as the case may be, within one week and before deciding the appeal on merits.

¶37

Disposed of.

¶38

Dasti.

¶39

(Surya Kant) Judge

¶40

(Jaspal Singh) September 08, 2015 Judge avin

¶41

AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.17 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

Ajmer Gir and Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajmer Gir and Anr. v. State of Punjab & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pratibha Sehgal Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Gurdev Ram Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Prem Chand Gupta Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ram Swrup Vs State of Haryana & Ors.

Gram Panchayat Chandpur Vs State of Punjab & Ors.