Disposed

Sansara v. Director Panchayat Punjab Chd and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC14 Sept 2015CWP/15802/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana addressed a writ petition alleging collusion between the Gram Panchayat and unauthorised occupants occupying Panchayat land. The court directed the Panchayat to initiate eviction proceedings within two months and tasked Deputy Commissioners with ensuring compliance.

What did the court decide?

The Gram Panchayat to take action against unauthorised occupants within two months; Deputy Commissioners to ensure compliance.

Sansara Vs Director Panchayat Punjab… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

¶2

Sr. No.: 222

¶3

Civil Writ Petition No.15802 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 14, 2015

Sansara

..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

Director, Panchayat, Punjab & others

¶8

..... RESPONDENT(S)

¶9

. . .

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH

¶11

. . .

¶12

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶13

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶14

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶15

. . .

¶16

PRESENT : - Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.

¶17

Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.4 – Gram Panchayat.

¶18

Surya Kant, J (Oral)

¶19

The short grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that Gram Panchayat – respondent No.4 is colluding

¶20

with unauthorised occupants, some of whom have been impleaded as party respondents and allegedly is not initiating

¶21

any eviction proceeding.

¶22

AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.16 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

¶23

CWP No.15802 of 2015 [2]

¶24

It may be mentioned here that notice of motion was issued only to the Gram Panchayat to show cause as to why action is not being taken against unauthorised occupants.

¶25

Learned counsel for the Gram Panchayat though has controverted the petitioner’s allegation of collusion, however, he undertakes that the Gram Panchayat shall take action against the unauthorised occupants in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

¶26

As an abundant precaution, we direct Deputy Commissioner, SBS Nagar (Nawanshahar) and Additional Deputy Commissioner (Development), SBS Nagar (Nawanshahar) to ensure that lawful action is initiated by Gram Panchayat for removal of encroachments from the Gram Panchayat land.

¶27

(Surya Kant) Judge

¶28

(Jaspal Singh) September 14, 2015 Judge

¶29

avin

¶30

AVIN KUMAR 2015.09.16 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh

Sansara v. Director Panchayat Punjab Chd and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sansara v. Director Panchayat Punjab Chd and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar & Anr. Vs Pb Urban Development Authority & Ors.

Pala Ram and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Amrik Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Tehal Singh and Anr. Vs Joint Development Commissioner and Ors.

Kiran Lata and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Piara Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.