Raghubir v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition against an eviction order under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, permitting him to instead file a suit for declaration of ownership under Section 13-A, noting the eviction order did not preclude the merits of such future litigation.
What did the court decide?
Petition withdrawn with liberty to institute a suit under Section 13-A of the Act.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.15674 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 15, 2015
Raghubir
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH.
Present: Mr.Pankaj Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner.
-.-
- Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- To be referred to the Reporters or not?
- Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance against the eviction order can be addressed by withdrawing this writ and pursuing a declaration suit under Section 13-A.
Whether the observations in the eviction orders affect the merits of a future petition filed under Section 13-A.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raghubir
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Surya Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWP/15674/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court