Kamaljit Singh Bajaj v. Ut of Chandigarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn in oral order.
Petitioner's writ petition allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn in oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 12214 of 2015 Date of decision: 03.08.2015
Kamaljit Singh Bajaj
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of U.T., Chandigarh and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Kirpal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
The petition is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
03.08.2015 shivani
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.08.04 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.08.04 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kamaljit Singh Bajaj
State of U.T., Chandigarh
S.J. Vazifdar
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court