Oral disposals of STA Appeal regarding extension of time to deposit tax demand as a condition for hearing on merits. Appeal set aside upon deposit.
Extension of time granted to deposit tax amount; impugned order set aside and appeal to be heard on merits upon deposit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STA No. 14 of 2015 (O & M) Date of Decision:- 31.07.2015
M/s. Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
......Appellant(s)
vs.
Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Ludhiana
......Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present:Dr. Naveen Rattan, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate, for the respondent.
S.J. VAZIFDAR, A.C.J. (Oral)
We have granted the appellant the extension of time to deposit the amount which the appellant was required to deposit as a condition precedent to the maintainability of the appeal vide order of even date in C.M. 12448-CII of 2015 in STA No. 06 of 2015.
This appeal is disposed of in the same terms.
Further in event of the amount being deposited as directed by
or order in C.M. 12448-CII of 2015 in STA No. 06 of 2015, the impugned order shall stand set aside and the appeal is to be heard on merits. Needless to add that if the appellant does not deposit the entire amount as directed, the appeal stand stand dismissed.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
31.07.2015
shivani SHIVANI GUPTA 2015.08.03 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M/s. Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Ludhiana
S.J. VAZIFDAR
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
